Rusldalovemusl Says:

Mar 7, 2011 - Can someone please interperate what they are saying, especially the witnesses? if indeed thats what they are?

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 7, 2011 - We're trying to translate as quick as we can sir. Firstly you should try to check the original recording with the dialoge just translated here: watch?v=j_Zqy5kuDbE We are almost 100x100 sure that a cover up has been applied here, creating a false viral publicity campaign -as they always do- for a 'piza packaging company'. You may check all the referred links on the text under the embeded video on: watch?v=IYrQ8y4S2oc Belive me: We're doing our best. Thanks for commenting.

31blackdemon Says:

Mar 7, 2011 - So for you it is a FAKE?

31blackdemon Says:

Mar 7, 2011 - So for you it is a FAKE?

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - This is probably THE FIRST TV News report about this event. The TV presenter told that the images were recorded by a guy called "Amador". That guy reported them there about a HUGE tremble on the ground when the UFO left that place. Agudos' population ALL reported the same kind of earthquake and brightness on sky when they were interviewed by TV. But no earthquake was admited by any Seismology Departments of Brasília and São Paulo. So none tectonic movement caused that tremble...

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - After that, nobody knows where is the original cameraman: 'Amador'. Instead of that, the tape appears on the Internet uploaded by a guy named Henrique Barduco who didn't know who sent it to him. Lately the video is 'analyzed' on brazilian TV show: "Detetive virtual" where a 3D experts team revealed the existence of a frame (00.00.39.02) where the UFO dissapears. But if you analyze by yourself that frame in the Hi res copy, a lot of pixelation can be appreciated. That isn't normal.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - Another guy called André Angélico told the media that he was the original creator of that recording and the 3D UFO modellation and insertion. Arguing they were designing a publicity campaign for a "pizza packaging" company but they didn't want to be discovered. Even he ensured that they left that fault frame in order to demonstrate the people that UFO wasn't really there. But he didn't show a single "step-by-step" demo about how they did the 3D composition and post-production.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - In fact he hardly appeared on TV more than 10 seconds explaining "his creation", meanwhile a lot of 3D experts are interviewed in order to analyze the sequence in other TV reports. If you find that pixelation on that "blank frame" it's due to a 'clone stamp tool' manipulation of the video layer. In fact not only the UFO, but even the cloud appears to be cut there. The rest of adjoining frames are perfect with no pixelation at all. So, someone deleted deliberately the UFO there.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - 3D inserts are made by means of 32 bits alpha channel. It allows to add 3D models in a separate layer. If the UFO had to be removed from an specific frame -deliberately or even by accident- no 'stamp clone tool' deleting operation were needed. Only removing the aditional layer allows to eliminate it with out manipulating of the original video background layer. If ONLY that frame has that pixelation someone used the 'clone stamp' tool there to erase... the real UFO. It's simple.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - You can check this by yourself importing the file into a pro software and analyzing that scandalous pixelation -only given on that concrete frame-. Not only this: André Angélico told the media they had registered the scene with a Hi-res camara. But if you see the shadow of the guy when leaving the car, you will only appreciate a very small engine: A cellular phone camara -as Amador told to TV station-. Later Angélico changed his version telling it was a Mid-res camara.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - André Angélico seems to be a corpulent person. The shadow of the guy who made the original recording doesn't seem to be so huge. Not even the voices of one and another matches at all. Watching André Angélico YouTube channel you will not find a single 3D demo on it. If he were so good 3D operator he should have included some of their demos there. But there's not a single WORD about 3D on his channel. And that "pizza packaging" company for sure doesn't exist at all either.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - The 'pizza packaging company" didn't have open their website, nor their YouTube channel until a few days later to these events; probably they had to launch them rapidly in order to try to demonstrate its 'real existence', once given some comments on YouTube about it. This has been another nonexistent company FALSE publicity campaign, designed to cover up the fact that the UFO was there, and of course it was as real as you. Counter-intelligence agencies always act the same way.

alnetworks2010 Says:

Mar 16, 2011 - Galicia Spanish UFO in 2009 was hidden the same way: They invented a nonexistent "Orson Wells' radio transmision 'War of the Worlds' "71,8" anniversary to try to debunk that SCANDALOUS Pleiadian format UFO: watch?v=vTgzzJpySow Araraquara UFO sightings were debunked with another nonexistent publicity campaign which never was referred after: watch?v=NGL1AeXP1Qw They even created a 3D demo then; but NEVER was done over the original video background layers, nor with same UFO.